About a year ago, I was in a meeting where a woman was addressing us. A guy at my back said, “why are women leading everywhere?"
I was reluctant to talk at first but later on, I was like, “do you have a problem with that?"
He said he doesn't just like it.
I think that will be the first time I heard and see someone expressly who is not pleased with women taking the lead.
I couldn't really engage him but that kind of man tends to see their wife's success as a threat or won't even want to empower them or any female folks.
I know if it was a man leading, he won't talk. I believe for anyone to be in a position, it shows they have what it takes in terms of capacity, delivery, knowledge, and value forgetting any biological configuration.
Women are more celebrated and appreciated when they are leading and doing great in their various fields because of the prior notion that they are weaker vessels, nothing much is expected from the gender, they ought to submit, and a lot of misconceptions.
Or they probably think women are weak because they are emotional.
I say, crying is not a sign of weakness, and holding up (man up as it is popularly called) is not a sign of strength. Standing tall and coming out of the situation as a better person is what we call strength.
Wives are to submit to their husbands in the lord and not women submitting to men in any other setting asides from an authority figure. If you have a problem with that? Then if your boss is a female, you can resign. I bet you don't want to try that.
The submission is in the confines of marriage. Note the Lordship of Christ there. Your head must have a head. If not, it's dangerous. That's why you are covered when your head submits to Christ knowing fully well that any of his direction and leading has been subject to his lordship.
